At 02:43 PM 9/18/02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I find this interesting. William Chambers is making a claim ... a 
supposition ... about my feelings towards him, when to the best of my 
knowledge, I have never spoken to this list about my contempt for or lack 
of contempt for, him. Now, it certainly is true that some others have 
spoken their minds about William Chambers, on this list. Even THAT bothered 
me.

He also is claiming that I, personally, am looking for ANY excuse to 
dismiss CR. But, I have publicly stated that I am NO expert in this area 
and have never claimed that I am. But, I have tried to encourage "civil" 
dialog about this.  In fact, I think in this "latest" round I have been the 
major one to encourage  those on the list to present examples and data how 
CR might be of some benefit or show that it is not ... to the general 
understanding of data, theories, behaviors, and the like.

I HAVE NO VESTED INTEREST ONE WAY OR THE OTHER IN CR!!!! I don't personally 
object to CR, what I DO object to vociferously is this continuing personal 
attack on individuals and their motives when there is no substantiation for 
such motives. How can this person know how I feel about him?

Nuff said.




>Dennis Roberts full comment is not included in your post but it seems
>characteristic of what I have come to expect from him. He seems to be
>looking for any excuse to dismiss CR, probably because of his contempt for
>me personally.

.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to