On 1 Oct 2002 13:25:34 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Treder) wrote: > All right, I can't hold my tongue any longer. > > Dr. Chambers, are you truly as big of an ass as your rantings make you > out to be, or is this just a put on?
It has a terribly long duration for a put-on. He is consistent with his past. My impression: he might be milder this time. Below: is what I posted near the start of this visitation - I was one (of several) who waved warning flags -- If you respond to him, even to spend a lot of time and effort on his thesis, he will *probably* vituperate you along the way. That's been shown again. ========= Post from September 5, 2002. Bill, Please go away. I find little that is pleasing in your content or style. You have had your say, SEVERAL times in the past. [Folks, if you like it, read the hundreds of messages from 1997-2000. There is nothing new this time.] On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:23:47 -0700, "William Chambers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - This is Bill, seducing his audience - "Put up some scholarly logic or shut up." - Bill, tossing a couple of ad-hominem - "And yes Paul I am a real doctor. And you can not stand it. Now try to grow up." - Bill, showing his courtesy and respect for Usenet tradition - "By the way, while we are exchanging notes, where do you work. I would like to call your boss and discuss your bad scholarship with him." Paul's crime here? Paul posted URLs so that folks could review Bill's previous contributions, from 1997, 1998, and 2000. The 'bad scholarship' might have been intended as a comment on their contents. Or not. ========= end of my post from Sept. 5. -- Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
