Judy and Annette,

If you have nothing of substance to say then be quiet. I am sure you are
both sweet girls, when you are not being catty, and I am sure you got your
jobs by hard work and not by seducing teachers and bosses. So why not use
your education and your intelligence and simply tell us what is wrong with
CR? If we could infer causation from correlation how should it impact the
CDC?  Do you have any moral obligation to be competent or are you simply
being paid to raise up your noses and condescend to us little people who
have to deal with crap that princesses such as yourselves manufacture. You
are exactly the kind of people who give women a bad name in science. Come
down off your thrones and walk away from Oedipus and get your feet dirty in
the real world. SEEK the truth, instead of a silk-lined nests where you are
treated as poorly little innocents oo-lala. You are just as guilty of fraud
as the bad boys who chase you. If you have something to say of substance
then say so. I am not a boy and I can see straight through your princess
routines. My wife is an intensive care nurse.I know what a real woman is. I
know how much reality real women can deal with. Now grow or go back to high
school.

Exactly where am I wrong in my CR method, doctors?

W. Chambers, PhD





"Conn, Judith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
6B7B0B0E8F2BD111AFE90001FA3751C90410809C@MCDC-ATL-62">news:6B7B0B0E8F2BD111AFE90001FA3751C90410809C@MCDC-ATL-62...
> I agree.  I have just deleted the emails.  Judy Conn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Annette E. Davis-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
>
>
> I am a member of this list serve to learn from the experts different
> techniques on SPSS and statistics.  I am not sure who Mr. Chambers is or
> the party in which he has this ongoing feud with, but I really do not
> care.  I would appreciate it GREATLY if they would take their private
> feud and/or conversation to a private level.  They have the e-mail
> address of each other-- can they not conduct their conversations on a
> more private basis?  This is not professional conduct.  When Mr.
> Chambers speaks of abuse .......I think he has his "victims" mixed up.
> Sorry - Enough is enough!
> .
> .
> =================================================================
> Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
> problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
> .                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
> =================================================================



.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================
  • Re: Conn, Judith
    • bijag

Reply via email to