If it is so darned effective at cutting spam, how come I'm still getting 20-30 clear and evident spams per day?
Where can I complain to, so that I can cut down on the offers for HOT G_RLS doing things with refinanced mortgages that I can't even imagine? the offending stuff from Edstat is/was (a) tame, and (b) a lot closer to the definitional edge of "spam" than what I get from clearly anonymous sources. Go for it, Jackie! Time to get back to work, Jay Paul Bernhardt wrote: > E. Jacquelin Dietz said on 11/1/02 9:15 AM: > > > If ANYONE complains again to SpamCop, we will not be given another chance. > > We might as well have begged our buddy who loves corresponding > regressions to complain to SpamCop. Has it occured to anyone at SpamCop > that some people might use their system for malicious purposes? > > Paul -- Jay Warner Principal Scientist Warner Consulting, Inc. 4444 North Green Bay Road Racine, WI 53404-1216 USA Ph: (262) 634-9100 FAX: (262) 681-1133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.a2q.com The A2Q Method (tm) -- What do you want to improve today? . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
