Hi to all,

I have  a couple of questions, one of which has been bubbling round in
my mind for some years, the other is more recent. The recent one is the
following:

The use of the t distribution in inference on the mean is on the whole
straightforward; my question relates to the theory underlying this use.
If Z = (X - mu)/sigma is ~ N(0, 1), then is T = (X - mu)/s (where s is
the sample SD based on a simple random sample of size n) ~ t(n-1)?

My second question is on the matter of confidence intervals. In my
explanation here I am using the convention of upper case letter to
represent the random variable, lower case to represent a value of the
variable.

The expression P(Xbar - 1.96 x SE < mu < Xbar + 1.96 x SE) = 0.95 is a
perfectly good prediction interval - it expresses the probability of
getting a sample mean which satisfies this inequality.

Now replace the RV Xbar by the observed sample value to give the
interval: xbar - 1.96 x SE < mu < xbar + 1.96 x SE. This is of course
the confidence interval on the population mean mu.

Whatever is said in the text books, this is understood by most people as
a statement that "mu lies in the interval with probability 0.95" - or
something very close to this. In effect, we define a secondary notional
variable Y which imagines that we could find out the 'true' value of mu;
Y = 1 if this true value is in the confidence interval, = 0 otherwise -
and we estimate the probability that Y = 1 as 0.95.

I have been teaching statistics for 30-odd years and have become more
and more disillusioned with the treatment of confidence intervals in the
text books!

So my question is: how do YOU explain to students what a confidence
interval REALLY is?

Regards,
Alan


--
Alan McLean
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+61 03 9803 0362


.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to