On 27 Nov 2002 07:03:54 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Simon, Steve, PhD) wrote:
> Is it "Bayesian" or "Bayesean"? I've always used the former, but I just saw > the latter on > > Bayeseans vs. Non-Bayeseans > http://http://members.tripod.com/~Probability/bayes02.htm Google on web sites gives 408,000 hits for Bayesian, and 250 hits for Bayesean. 1000-to-1 is a discrepancy in hits that usually means 'mis-spelling' but I see slight support for saying that it is intentional, as follows: Google today showed me a feature that I don't remember seeing before. Google presented a sort of index for each: - for Bayesian, science > math> statistics > Bayesian analysis; - and for the -ean, computers > artificial intelligence > belief networks > software . Google on usenet groups shows 250,000 hits versus 131 hits. -- Rich Ulrich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pitt.edu/~wpilib/index.html . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
