In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jose Luiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> except for one advanced number theory class I took, the > only > math I have on my transcript is one year of calculus (calculus I and II, > no > linear algebra). I took numerous advanced stat/econometric courses I'm curious. Did the numerous advanced stat classes not ever presume more advanced math than you took? For example, multiple linear regression is conveniently expressed with matrices. And proofs about properties of statistics often seem to me to require a language of advanced math, including measure theory. -- Try http://csf.colorado.edu/pkt/pktauthors/Vienneau.Robert/Bukharin.html To solve Linear Programs: .../LPSolver.html r c A game: .../Keynes.html v s a Whether strength of body or of mind, or wisdom, or i m p virtue, are found in proportion to the power or wealth e a e of a man is a question fit perhaps to be discussed by n e . slaves in the hearing of their masters, but highly @ r c m unbecoming to reasonable and free men in search of d o the truth. -- Rousseau . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
