On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 16:43:30 -0600, "Fan Yang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Suppose arrivals come as a rate lambda Poisson process. Let Au be
> the time since the last arrival up to time u. Precisely, if
> 0 = T0 < T1 < T2 < T3 < ...  where {Ti : i >= 1} are the arrival times
> and Ti <= u < Ti+1, then Au = u-Ti which is a number in [0, u]. In
> particular,
> if there are no arrivals in [0, u] then we set At = t.

You mean "...then we set Au = u"

This somewhat artificial definition can be interpreted more naturally
as: the first arrival takes place at t=0 with probabilty 1, i.e.
N(0)=1.


> The notation Au
> refers to
> age, namely the age of the most recent arrival.
> 
> Find the probability distribution of Au, by giving the cumulative
> distribution function Gu(t) = P[Au <= t] for all real t.
> 
> **********************************************************
> The following is my solution.
> 
> P[A(u)>t]  =  P[u-A(u)<u-t] = P[T(i) < u-t]
> = P[no arriavals in (u-t, u)]
> = P[N(u)-N(u-t) = 0]
> = exp(-lamba*t)
> 
> Then P[A(u)<=t]  = 1-exp(-lamba*t)
> 
> Is it right?

Partially ;-)

F_past[u](t) = 1-exp(-lamba*t) for 0<=t<u
               1 for t>=u

It is crucial to note that the cdf is *discontinuous* for t=u due to
the fact that we force an arrival t=0

It is different from the waiting time for the next event in the future
which has the distribution

F_future[u](t) = 1-exp(-lambda*t)  0<=t<oo

A more natural distribution would be the age of the last arrival up to
t=u under the condition that there was at last one arrival in the past
using the standard definition N(0)=0.

                 1  
F[u](t) = ---------------- * (1-exp(-lambda*t)
          1-exp(-lambda*u)


which increases continuously from 0 to 1 in [0,1].

-- 
Horst

.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to