Hi all,
Thanks for all those messages !!! I really appreciate the time and
help of those who post a reply to questions posed ..
I conclude that my case is a repeated measures design with repeated
measures on factors fit and finish..
Which is the best way to enter the data in spss ?

i have 5 columns 

column1     col2             col3            col4        col5

Subject     med_w/o finish   large_w/o fin   med_w/fin   lar_w/fnsh
1
.
.
.
8

And i go to GLM -> Repeated measrues -> Within factor (fit-2 and
finish-2)

Is this the right step?? should i add anythign in the "between
subjects column"??

Please let me know about this..

Regards
Archana




Bruce Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Paige Miller wrote:
> > Archana wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Iam textile engineering looking for some statistical advice.
> >> I have the following test garments (total 4 types)-
> >>
> >> Type A - medium and large
> >> Type B - medium and large
> >>
> >> The same 8 subjects wore the shirts and perfomred some physical
> >> activity. Their heart rate, skin and core temperature etc were
> >> monitored. I want to find out if the heart rate or the other
> >> parameters are significant for the 4 types of shirt. What do i follow?
> >> One way anova or repeated measures design and why?
> > 
> > 
> > Neither, I think.
> > 
> > This is not a one-way ANOVA, as you have three factors (Type A, Type B 
> > and subject). Therefore, it should be a three-way ANOVA. I see nothing 
> > that would indicate this is a repeated measures design, which to me 
> > usually implies repeat measurements over time. Subjects are not a 
> > repeated measure, they are a classification variable that is crossed 
> > with Type A and Type B.
> > 
> 
> 
> As I understand the original post, the sources of variance 
> in the summary table are as follows:
> 
> Source        df
> -----------   --
> Between Ss     7
> Within Ss
>     A          1
>     A*S                7  (error term for A)
>     B          1
>     B*S                7  (error term for B)
>     A*B                1
>     A*B*S      7  (error term for A*B)
> ---------     --
> Total         31
> 
> 
> I would call this a 2x2 repeated measures (or within-Ss) 
> design, with repeated measures on both A and B.  I gather 
> that you would call it something else, Paige.  Is that right?
> 
> Cheers,
> Bruce
.
.
=================================================================
Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the
problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at:
.                  http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/                    .
=================================================================

Reply via email to