In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert J. MacG. Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I seem to recall from my long-ago exposure to numerical analysis that >there are formulae that work significantly better than the "standard" >ones in terms of rounding error, but I've never seen them in a stats >text. Anbody know a good reference?
I believe there is a discussion (with references) in Ron Thistead's book. . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
