> Which leaves the alternative, at least for those of us unaffiliated, to > rant at them. Or at least that is the only alternative I have been able > to see. > > But nobody likes a ranter. > > I should know ;) > > Art
Those with money who don't like the science party line of the day, are likely to create affiliations out of whole cloth, and fund counter-science. In the global warming department, you'll find the Hoover Institute with funding from Scaife, pushing back against the UCSD Scripps Institution of Oceanography and National Geographic, for example. At least that's my current birds eye view, which may be inaccurate, since global warming is only a peripheral vision thing for me at the moment -- right out there with OWL, DAML and RDF. In any case, that's an alternative to ranting as an unaffiliated being. Either make some new friends, or, failing that, buy some. Kirby _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
