> -----Original Message----- > From: Kirby Urner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Where might a self-proclaimed intelligent person go to discuss with > other > > such persons 1 through 7, without the diversion of 8? > > > > I'd be open to your listing range(7), i.e. [0,1,2,3,4,5,6].
First let me address number 8, positively. Because I am positive that open source is a significant and important + mark. Barry Warsaw has a blog with one entry: Learning by Breaking http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=5477 Open source software is eminently breakable - and therefore eminently suitable for learning. But the prospect of making this an effective selling point - no matter how saliently true it might be under a particular circumstance - is so daunting as to seem foolhardy. And I keep coming of against that - what seems true seems foolhardy to pursue. So I tend to fall back on an instinct to fight to call a halt to the process in its entirety. Art _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
