> So I find that rejecting it as naïve is fundamentally unresponsive. > > Art >
However in this case I don't think your views were rejected as naïve. On the contrary, your views permeated a sophisticated discussion of use cases, and design patterns more generally (s'been a rich thread) plus Scott sort of liked your using () to connote dynamism (I didn't). The tone was always peer to peer. And we came out in different places re properties, which is fine. I'm not going to change my ways just because of peer group considerations -- I'm not that feckless. Kirby _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
