________________________________
From: Anna Martelli Ravenscroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 18:25 -0700, Radenski, Atanas wrote: >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On > > Behalf Of Arthur >> > Beauty is beauty, and is never useful. >> >> 'Beautiful' is what gives us pleasure. (Things that give us pleasure can >> be useful at times, perhaps.) > >It is selfish to do thing simply for pleasure. It is not necessarily selfish to do things simply for pleasure. It can be a most natural, harmless, and acceptable activity. Imagine I am looking at a flower, the flower is beautiful, looking at it gives me pleasure, so I continue looking just for the pleasure of it, but why should that be called 'selfish'? >Women are raised to be unselfish. Really? All of them? >Anna Atanas _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
