Daniel Ajoy wrote: >On 26 Feb 2006 at 9:04, Arthur wrote: > > > >>>>Really_ can any of those tools be used to program tacitly? >>>>That is without the need to use variables (with the help of >>>>"forks", "hooks" and the like)? >>>> >>>> >>Expressed as someone in touch with esoteric knowledge. >> >>I am guessing it's a Logo thing. >> >>Are you willing to expand? >> >> > >I just wanted to verify the claim that some Python modules >really incorporate J semantics. > > Perhaps the problem is I didn't understand that such a claim was being made. I thought it was a reference to access to extensive array processing functionality. I am happily lost in the discussion beyond that.
Function-level, value-level, whatever. I am the last to claim that Python is easy. I do claim that it is not effete. These distinctions, to me, fall into the realm of the effete - and are not where I prefer to spend my time or energy. So I perhaps wasted your time by asking you to expand. Art _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
