> And I can't easily explain why I felt the need to push it a step further -
Do give it a try, please. > to in fact having a more truly full implementation of complex numerics > contained *as* my object - not as an attribute of it. But there were > reasons. Some more practical, more less. Well, if you do it right, the enclosing code would not be different from that of a "truly full" implementation. That's why we use objects in the first place! The rest of the code should need no information about how you implement your mutable complex type. So unless there's a performance issue I can't see what you lose by wrapping the complex number. mt _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
