On 23 Sep 2006 at 12:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You CANNOT articulate OO on a TI. You can?t create a class. Most people > don?t care, right now, because they don?t even know what that means, but I > can guarantee you that there?s a bunch of scientists at places like > CalTech who DO care! Mathematics is already object-oriented, and the > curriculum of the future will need to make students conscious of that > fact. OO is not something just for CS majors! Seriously.
I don't believe this to be true. 2+3 What I see about from a mathematical point of view is two things, and an operator that acts upon those things. The OO point of view is that 2 is an object and that the plus sign is a method of this object and that 3 is the argument of this method. The OO point of view is *nothing like* the mathematical point of view. In math, operators and numbers are two different things and the former don't "belong" to later. Daniel _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig