In a message of Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:52:26 +0200, Gregor Lingl writes: > > >Laura Creighton schrieb: >> I think it would help if an actual teacher got involved before they >> decide what teachers want without consultation ... >> >> Laura >> >> >Hmmm, don't know what to do with this. Seems to be a reply to some postin >g. >Ok, I'm a teacher, but I definitely do not belong to the circle of >pycon-organizers ... > >I think it would be helpful if you posted the original to EduSig? > >Best wishes, >Gregor >> ps -- unfortunately you have to subscribe to read the archive. I have >> no idea why. http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pycon-organizers >> _______________________________________________ >> Edu-sig mailing list >> Edu-sig@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
There are lots of notes by now. And that is the unfortunate part, you have to subscribe to read them. Plus the whole list is in an uproar as part of discovering that PyCON lost a bunch of money this year. But since I know some people on this list have strong ideas about how a poster session at pycon should be organised, I thought it was time to put the word out that now is when such things are being discussed. The initial article was mine. I said that I would like PyCON better if there was some way to get a track of 'what have you been doing lately'. The sort of talks that would not get accepted to PyCON because they are not polished enough, or not of interest to a large enough segment of the community. Somebody suggested posters, and the whole topic took off from there. Laura _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig
