In a message of Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:13:21 -0700, kirby urner writes: >On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Laura Creighton <l...@openend.se> wrote: > >> >In sketching out the Python ecosystem in broad brush terms, is it fair to >> >say NumPy gets a lot of US investment whereas PyPy is more an EU pet >> >project? Or is that too broad brush? >> >> Too broad. In investment terms, PyPy gets from _everywhere_, >> including lots from the USA. But PyPy core contributors are still >> mostly from not-in-the-USA ... unless things have changed in the last >> 6 months while I have been busy elsewhere. >> >> Laura >> >> >OK. I was partly asking because I know the US government is putting funds >directly into Blaze: > >http://continuum.io/blog/blaze > >I don't know if the US government itself directly pays for PyPy >development, but my impression is the EU itself does. > >Kirby
The EU has in the past. But there hasn't been an EU grant proposal written for a while. Laura _______________________________________________ Edu-sig mailing list Edu-sig@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-sig