On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 08:14 -1000, R. Scott Belford wrote: > I am very disillusioned with Edubuntu, the leadership (or lack thereof) > and the false claims of functionality.
I can't tell you how happy I am to see this post — and happy to see that somebody else sees it the way I do. I don't see your post as a troll (although it is certainly flamebait). I have been trialling Edubuntu LTSP on-and-off for the last couple of years, and every experience has been nothing short of painful. It's been riddled with bugs, visual glitches, incomplete documentation, and is generally of inferior quality compared with the quality and polish of the Ubuntu desktop distribution. I'm not saying it's the developers' fault that Edubuntu is like this. Obviously, it's the lack of contributors and bug testers (QA currently sucks) that is really hurting the project (so, if anything, it's my fault, as I should be contributing). My point is that what _really_ gets to me are the false claims that the project makes that the parent talks about. If Edubuntu is "riddled with bugs, visual glitches, and is generally of inferior quality" (quoting myself here), then don't say "Thin client deployments offers clients a lower TCO (total cost of ownership), simpler installation and easier maintenance than typical IT deployments." I think we need to see respins (a.l.a. 6.06.1) instead of turning a blind eye (ignorance is bliss), longer development cycles, and possibly even skipping shipping Edubuntu every other Ubuntu release to focus on quality. -- edubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
