This was an example a question I had that the reply was less then supportive. But enough with that. My point to this emails is how do we create a we? Can there be a bit more enduser involvement. Seems edu is a lot of good developer but maybe not enough enduser/admin feedback and say?
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:00 -1000, R. Scott Belford wrote: > Scott Balneaves wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:55:58AM -0400, Alfred Nutile wrote: > >> Hold on there Scott L. Balneaves ( -: > >> I am with you on your reply. > >> What I am getting at is we are using Fiesty now, and is Gutsy ready to > >> be used or are there more kinks to work out before Edu thinks it is > >> ready. > > > > It's Released, therefore, we think it's ready. > > We thought it was ready, so, it was Released. > > Who was the "we" and where are you Now? > Since it was not ready, what can we Do? > > It seems that there are many of us wishing to be part of the "we", but I > don't see how much less who to ask. This is all about being positive, > pro-active, and results focused. I want to be part of the solution, and > I am trying, but I don't know the way. > > > > > Scott > > > > --scott > -- edubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
