I am up to going to the meetings. But the link you offer below brings you to a page that does not show when the next meeting is. Yes I know from below and past meeting notes it is Wed. Then the link http://fridge.ubuntu.com/event Takes you to a caledar that does not have one meeting for Edu? But again I will be there. Alfred Nutile ps..excuse my ignorance do I add or minus from Eastern US time to get 12:00 UTC??? sorry On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 13:33 +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Di, 2007-12-11 at 08:14 -1000, R. Scott Belford wrote: > > > > I am very disillusioned with Edubuntu, the leadership (or lack thereof) > how many of the weekly meetings did you attend yet ? we welcome > everybody to participate, thats the place where we discuss all > changes .... > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Edubuntu/Community/MeetingAgenda > > its held every wednesday on an alternating schedule (12:00 UTC, 20:00 > UTC) > > > We can't say that 7.10 built on the functionality of 7.04 - it actually > > regressed. > in which feature ? ther are two regression bugs i'm aware about, one is > a leftover debugging line in ltspfsmounter that sets a fixed DISPLAY > variable (easy workaround, delete the line), the other is intel cards > wanting to run at 32bit on chipsets that cant which is a bug in the > driver ... i`m not aware of any regression thats in any feature that was > existing in feisty ... > > note that the edubuntu distro is mainly a one man show with a handfull > of communiy contributors it would be great if we could enhance the > tester team (i think i`m the only one that has a thin client with intel > chipset in this team fo example, my chipset doesnt expose the bug above > which could have been easily found by someone else)... > > the testers team is definately the area where we lack most devlopment > needs feedback, which we apparently only get past release > > > > > Is there *anyone* in the Edubuntu community either a. working on a r1 > > release for all the bugs in 7.10 or b. working on consistent > > documentation for the varying incompatible releases? If so, then where, > > so I can help. If not, then why not, and should we change this? I have > > tried to find ways to help by starting here > scott balneaves worked 60h weeks for getting the edubuntu handbook we > ship in shape, you are welcome to enhance the doc team, while i disagree > that edubuntu is any worse in automation but agree that there are bugs > (and yes, i`m working on a fix for ltspfs that may got to gutsy-updates > if the ubuntu release team sees there was enough testing for the > package) > > > Edubuntu is doing a tremendous disservice to the FOSS community by > > riding on the coattails of the K12LTSP and Debian-edu while pretending > > to be just as capable. People are being fooled, drawn in, and then > > disappointed. This is not honorable. > > > > Is there anyone around capable, willing, and prepared to keep this from > > happening in future releases? > we`re greatful for every helping hand ... > > ciao > oli
-- edubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
