Thanks for all the feedback. It seems that having both fat and thin would be ideal but I don't have that option. I only have the one lab and it may be difficult to keep it as we continue to grow.
I think the admin benefits of a thin-client currently outweigh the speed benefits of a fat-client and given I know how to do the thin-client and all the authentication it may not be worth it to switch. I would be curious to learn more about running fat-clients with a thin-client component (i.e. local installs with auth and home dirs on the server). If there is a way to "push" packages to the clients as well (I know we have a tool in our district for this on windows) that would even be better. Thanks again. Any additional thoughts would be appreciated. Jim -- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- edubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
