*Call for papers [REMINDER]:* *History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
2021 Special Issue.*


Topic of the Special Issue: “Normativity and the Life Sciences: Analytical
and Continental Perspectives”

Guest editors:

Luca Corti

Ivan Moya-Diez

Matteo Vagelli

We are inviting submissions for a Special Issue of History and Philosophy
of the Life Sciences. This special issue will be devoted to the topic of
‘Normativity and the Life Sciences: Analytical and Continental
Perspective'. Below you can find the rationale of the Issue.

Submission instructions:

All submissions, as well as inquiries about submissions to the special
issue, should be sent by e-mail to the guest editors:
*[email protected]
<[email protected]>*


Submissions must not be submitted to or be under review at other journals,
books, etc.

Submissions should not be longer than 9000 *words*, they should be sent as
.doc files and they should include an *abstract of 150 to 250 words*. The
abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified
references.

Submissions should be prepared for blind review: All identifying
information about the author(s) such as names or institutional
affiliations, have to be removed. Self-citations have to be anonymized.

Submission deadline:  October 15th, 2020

RATIONALE OF THE SPECIAL ISSUE:
In recent years, normativity and the status of norms have been at the
center of several key debates in both the Continental and analytical
traditions.. The question of normativity encompasses contentious issues
touching various areas, including philosophy of biology, philosophy of mind
and cognition, as well as metaethics. The development of disciplines tied
to evolution (such as evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, etc.)
as well as to the organisation of living beings (such as system biology)
has driven a new interest and led to the introduction of crucial new
perspectives into the philosophical conversation on norms.

Within this framework, the relation between norms and the phenomenon of life
has become central: various thinkers coming from different philosophical
traditions have analysed the problem of normativity from the premise that
norms originate within life or the living organism and are tied to
functions, or located norms in an evolutionary framework. Arguments from
the life sciences have powerfully entered the debate not only in philosophy
of medicine but also in metaethics..

We intend this special issue to open space for dialogue between
philosophers and historians of science with different methodological
approaches to normativity and its relation to the life sciences. By putting
Continental, historical, and analytical approaches to vital normativity in
conversation, the special issue aims to provide a synoptic view that sheds
new light on individual topics, such as the origins and status of
normativity in life or the strategies for naturalising norms offered by the
theoretical framework of the life sciences. This dialogue will mobilize the
work of Canguilhem, and, through him, the approach fostered by historical
epistemology. It will engage analogous questions emerging from a classical
German context. Literature on classical German philosophy and the problem
of living normativity is abundant and scholarship on Canguilhem biology and
vitalism is growing steadily, but no relevant connection between them has
yet been drawn. This special issue will bring these two strands together
and connect them with contemporary Anglo-American debates on the
naturalisation of norms.

Topics for submitted papers might include, but are not limited to:


   -

   Normativity and explanation in the life sciences
   -

   Forms and accounts of biological normativity
   -

   The notion of “function”: philosophical and historical perspectives
   -

   Norms and evolution
   -

   Historical reflection on normativity, life and cognition (in areas such
   as French Epistemology, Classical German Philosophy, etc.)
   -

   Vital normativity and the epistemology of the life sciences
   -

   Teleology and its normative import: philosophical and historical aspects
   -

   The relation between social and vital norms


Invited contributors:

Michael Ruse (Florida State University)

Dennis Walsh (Toronto)

Monica Greco (Goldsmith, University of London)

    Silvia De Cesare (Université de Genève)

--
https://www.vidal-rosset.net/mailing_list_educasupphilo.html
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        

Répondre à