Hi Leigh,

Thanks for that very well-considered post. I like the flipped classroom
concept as well. Would you mind if I forwarded your email around to other
people and lists?

Thanks!

Pine


On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Leigh Thelmadatter <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If you think of "education" as the provision of information, then yes, the
> Internet is "replacing teachers". However, it is really not doing anything
> different than books, video and audio; none of which has replaced teachers.
>
> There is a social component to education, the interaction with those who
> have more experience and yes, knowledge, that a computer cannot match. Even
> with a memorization-heavy subject like history, you still need a teacher,
> if for nothing else, to help sift through and analyze the mass of
> information and interpretations now available.
>
> Remember, we went through similar predictions with videotaped lessons,
> before that, televised lessons and even before that, correspondence
> courses. However, the completion rate on these are dismal, because people
> need interaction and structure at the very least.
>
> Rather than thinking of technology as replacing teachers, it is radically
> challenging teachers and educational institutions, not so much because that
> it is providing information in a radically different way, but because
> information is now ubiquitous. If teachers and schools dont exist simply to
> provide a set of information to learn, what should we be doing? There is no
> clear answer, but from experience, I do know it will require being a LOT
> more active and interactive than it used to be. If students are going to
> plunk money down for formal education, those hours in the classroom need to
> count for a lot more than they use to.
>
> As for Wikipedia, I dont see the educational value in it so much as the
> technology, but rather that it provides an opportunity for students to
> "apprentice"  especially from my point of view as a language teacher.
> Students are creating and modifying texts, which are not simple exercises
> but the "real thing" with real consequences. And not just texts, but other
> forms of media such as video and digital animation.... Wiki Learning is
> doing a couple projects of this type as we speak now.
>
> However, none of this indicates that working with Wikipedia means a purely
> online environment. Perhaps just the opposite. Creating Wikipedia content
> is not drill-work,but rather so-very human. With its mass of rules and
> norms, the involvement of someone who has experience becomes more
> essential. This is why very few new editors stick around and why the
> Education Program has the concept of Campus Ambassadors.
>
> IMHO, technology is best used in these situations: to take drill work out
> of the classroom, to take lecture out of the classroom (flipped classroom)
> and to allow students to do activities that before were not possible
> before.  Wikipedia fits in the last category, because perhaps its greatest
> contribution to education is allowing students to publish work for the
> world to see within a community that is outside campus.
>
> Leigh
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:30:06 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: [Wikimedia Education] Wikipedia's role in Internet-based education
>
>
> I'm interested in hearing experienced educators' and researchers' thoughts
> about what roles Wikipedia, and Internet-based learning in general, can and
> can't do well.
>
> Articles for consideration:
>
>
> http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-0608-godsey-altschool-teachers-20150608-story.html
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/06/04/technology-wont-fix-americas-neediest-schools-it-makes-bad-education-worse/
>
> What does Wikipedia education do well, and what doesn't it do well?
>
> Is Wikipedia-based education amplifying the learning of students who are
> likely to be from highly resourced schools?
>
> Do we have evidence that Wikipedia based education has outcomes for
> students that are similar to, or better than, other kinds of online
> learning?
>
> How can we offer a service that is widely beneficial for students and
> teachers with limited technological resources? Or should we not try because
> of the additional challenges?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Pine
>
> _______________________________________________ Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>
> _______________________________________________
> Education mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
>
>
_______________________________________________
Education mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education

Reply via email to