Agree with Pierre. No problem with this, since we have been using native installation for production and test environment. It's interesting to use docker-based for devstack.
On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 12:07:36 AM UTC+7, Ned Batchelder wrote: > > Hi all, > > As you may or may not know, until now we have had three supported > installation styles for our Open edX releases: > > 1. Devstack, a Vagrant-based installation for developers modifying > code. > 2. Fullstack, a Vagrant-based installation similar to a production > install. > 3. Native, an Ansible installation for use on Ubuntu machines such as > AWS. > > We are looking ahead to our next release, Hawthorn, and plotting how these > installations will change. > > Devstack will be based on Docker rather than Vagrant. EdX is using a > Docker-based devstack internally now, and we'll be ready to roll it out to > the community in Hawthorn. > > Native will remain as it is. > > The question now is, what should happen to Fullstack? We won't be ready > to support a Docker-based fullstack in the Hawthorn time frame. Does > Fullstack provide enough extra value over Native to warrant the time to > produce it? My inclination now is to simply drop Fullstack, and for people > to use the Native installation in a Vagrant image themselves if they want > that style of installation. > > Do others see the landscape differently? > > --Ned. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "General Open edX discussion" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edx-code/35fd06d1-5bcf-489a-9635-1621f093c294%40googlegroups.com.
