Hi all,

I want to share some new research in to Wikipedia article creation trends
on the 10 largest Wikipedias: English, German, French, Italian, Portuguese,
Spanish, Polish, Chinese, Japanese and Russian.

This work was led by Aaron Halfaker and done in part as background work in
to potential future design work by the Growth team, aimed at helping
newcomers be more successful at creating their first articles.

   - Slides are at:
   
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikipedia_article_creation_(Nov,_2013).pdf

   - and Aaron's talk was recorded as part of our first public research
   showcase at the Wikimedia Foundation: http://youtu.be/arO9YzcTWGE

This is really important insight in to the nature of who creates articles
and how on large Wikipedias. Aaron compares the overall success rates of
editors based on their experience level, as well as the workflow used to
create a page (direct creation, userspace draft, or a more elaborate review
process like English Wikipedia's Articles for Creation system).

In particular, some important or unusual conclusions/questions we have
are...

   1. Retention of articles by newly-registered users is actually getting
   worse over time. How can we use new software and better social policies to
   turn this around? In addition to Aaron's thoughts in the presentation, we
   have notes on mediawiki.org.[1][2]
   2. Except in Polish and English (where anonymous article creation is
   turned off) anonymous editors are actually much more prolific and
   successful article creators than users who create a page in their first 24
   hours after registering an account. How can we support these anonymous
   editors more? Our hypothesis about why they are more successful is
   currently that they include some experienced editors, including some small
   number of logged-out Wikipedians.
   3. Why is survival of new articles so high on Japanese Wikipedia?
   4. How can we seriously reform review processes like "Articles for
   Creation", Flagged Revisions, and so on? These backlogs of review hamper
   throughput of new articles created by newbies. In English Wikipedia's case,
   it is seriously choking off new article creation. The quality of articles
   that make it past is high, but is not enough to make up for the 50% (!)
   drop in volume of new articles in my view.

More thoughts are welcome,

1. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia_article_creation
2. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Draft_namespace and its /Usability
testing subpages

-- 
Steven Walling,
Product Manager
https://wikimediafoundation.org/
_______________________________________________
EE mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/ee

Reply via email to