On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Robert Virding <[email protected]> wrote: > A minor question: why is it -if and -elif and not -if() and -elif() so it is > consistent with -ifdef()? >
It seems to me that it is easier to read without the extra parenthesis, and that it makes the more "active" -if/-elif directives visually different from the "passive" attributes. Note that it is still legal to add extra parenthesis around the expression if you really want to. /Björn -- Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB _______________________________________________ eeps mailing list [email protected] http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
