Are you encouraging the use of non-local returns to work around a limitation of
the language?
Literally all new programming languages made these days have such a
short-circuiting construct some way or another that doesn't translate to
non-local returns. I don't see what makes Erlang so special that you would
argue it doesn't need one.
> Le 7 déc. 2018 à 12:28, Kenneth Lundin <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> It is perfectly possible to use throw and try catch to replace or simplify
> deeply-nested case ... end expressions in the same way as the proposed
> language extension does
>
> <>
_______________________________________________
eeps mailing list
[email protected]
http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/eeps
