> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>
> Sent: Freitag, 31. August 2018 14:16
> To: Bach, Pascal (BT CPS R&D ZG FW CCP) <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [meta-efibootguard][PATCH] Rename base package to
> efibootguard
> 
> On 2018-08-30 16:02, [ext] Pascal Bach wrote:
> > When setting the EFI_PROVIDER variable two things are expected:
> >
> > 1. A package with the name ${EFI_PROVIDER} exists that is included in
> > packagegroup-core-boot 2. A bbclass with the name ${EFI_PROVIDER}
> > exists
> >
> > With the current layer there is a class called efibootguard but the
> > package is called efibootguard-efi. These do not match.
> >
> > This renames the base package to efibootguard to match the class name.
> > This is also in line with how systemd-boot and grub-efi work.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   recipes-bsp/efibootguard/efibootguard.bb | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/efibootguard/efibootguard.bb
> > b/recipes-bsp/efibootguard/efibootguard.bb
> > index 3449fda..7d1081e 100644
> > --- a/recipes-bsp/efibootguard/efibootguard.bb
> > +++ b/recipes-bsp/efibootguard/efibootguard.bb
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ PACKAGES = "${PN}-tools-dbg \
> >               ${PN}-tools-staticdev \
> >               ${PN}-tools-dev \
> >               ${PN}-tools \
> > -            ${PN}-efi"
> > +            ${PN}"
> >
> >   EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-gnuefi-sys-dir=${STAGING_DIR_HOST} \
> >                   --with-gnuefi-include-dir=${STAGING_INCDIR}/efi \ @@
> > -38,7 +38,7 @@ FILES_${PN}-tools = "${bindir}"
> >   FILES_${PN}-tools-dbg = "/usr/src/debug ${bindir}/.debug /usr/lib/debug"
> >   FILES_${PN}-tools-staticdev = "${libdir}/lib*.a"
> >   FILES_${PN}-tools-dev = "${includedir}/${BPN}"
> > -FILES_${PN}-efi = "${libdir}/${BPN}"
> > +FILES_${PN} = "${libdir}/${BPN}"
> >
> >   do_deploy () {
> >     install ${B}/efibootguard*.efi ${DEPLOYDIR}
> >
> 
> Thanks, applied to next, targeting master, thus rocko+. If you think this
> should go into other branches as well, let us know.
> 
The patch is a result of me trying to get this layer working with current OE 
master (sumo+).

I have some more patches in the pipeline but they require a new release of 
efibootguard that includes the GCC 8 fixes.

> Jan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI 
Boot Guard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/355BE46A91031048906B695426A8D8E61B8A8254%40DEFTHW99EH4MSX.ww902.siemens.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to