Hi Jan, > You mean you want the effective ustate, considering what is the latest > env in use etc. - would be fine with me and likely has an even higher value.
yes, I agree that this would have a higher value, at least for all my use-cases. So I'd suggest to drop the current patch in favor of that new functionality. How about the following interface? $ bg_printenv --current --ustate ustate: 0 (OK) $ bg_printenv --current --ustate --raw 0 Kind regards, Michael -- Michael Adler Siemens AG T RDA IOT SES-DE Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 München, Deutschland Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe; Vorstand: Roland Busch, Vorsitzender; Klaus Helmrich, Cedrik Neike, Matthias Rebellius, Ralf P. Thomas, Judith Wiese; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI Boot Guard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/20211014125524.qmvf6nbumthponc5%40kratos.
