> FWIW, I took a deeper look into the whole libtool stuff and I can > only recommend not to do the same for your mental sanity...
Yes, I figured that much after taking a glimpse at their wrapper script ;) > Hence, can you please test whether the following patch solves the issue? Indeed, this resolves *that* issue, but something is still funny: in the case of incremental compilation, bg_setenv is linked against libebgenv-0.9.0.so. This is not the case if you run 'make clean' and build it from scratch. So I guess the following statement is not always true: > Luckily, we're after a statically linked bg_setenv anyway Just run ldd against ./bg_setenv and you will see yourself. Kind regards, Michael -- Michael Adler Siemens AG T RDA IOT SES-DE Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 81739 München, Deutschland Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe; Vorstand: Roland Busch, Vorsitzender; Klaus Helmrich, Cedrik Neike, Matthias Rebellius, Ralf P. Thomas, Judith Wiese; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI Boot Guard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/20211021063203.qw62mnwxzr5aw4ij%40kratos.
