[switching Tobias' address at this chance] On 14.07.22 09:02, Michael Adler wrote: >> the need for a configuration file format for efibootmgr. > > Just to clarify: with efibootmgr you mean efibootguard? More importantly, at > which stage do you want to parse the > configuration file? In "userspace" (bg_setenv and friends) or within the EFI > domain? In the EFI domain, you cannot use > shared objects (and might prefer "single header" style libraries). Also, the > license might also play a more important > role due to static linking.
We will need them in both domains, even writing in both (updating ustate). So, yes, being small or at least easily statically linkable will play an important role. Jan -- Siemens AG, Technology Competence Center Embedded Linux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EFI Boot Guard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/efibootguard-dev/b174520c-c114-d18a-3f82-f0b600067b46%40siemens.com.
