Mike Tremaine wrote: > > I see this problem in the Frox maillists also so its been around forever. > What > I'll try to do as soon as I have it perfect is rebuild the frox rpm with the > wrapper so it will be a painless upgrade. > >
Something else I've wondering about is if Frox is the only reason that Clamd needs be running then I wonder how bad it would be to switch from clamdscan to clamscan.... I Just ran a very simple test only my 550mhz 384MB machine... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # clamscan abiword-2.4.0.tar.gz abiword-2.4.0.tar.gz: OK ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 83198 Engine version: 0.88.7 Scanned directories: 0 Scanned files: 1 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 49.71 MB Time: 102.093 sec (1 m 42 s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # clamdscan abiword-2.4.0.tar.gz /root/abiword-2.4.0.tar.gz: OK ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Infected files: 0 Time: 116.107 sec (1 m 56 s) clamscan was faster against a big file which is interesting. On a busy machine of course clamd is going to be much more resource friendly but I wonder how ftp scanning really is going on. I'm sure that havp and amamvis are really doing most of the heavy virus scanning. -Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Efw-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/efw-user
