Sorry, I had a typo. I meant UNsetting the macros for enabling external
BLAS libraries. :-)

On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:20 AM 张瑞 <[email protected]> wrote:

> dear Rasmus,
>
> thanks for your reply, I tried to add the code  #define EIGEN_USE_BLAS,
> but it still doesn't work.
>
> and I found actually multiplication was done, it failed to assignment to
> the x matrix
>
>
> if the code is like this , it can be compiled successfully:
>
> Matrix<double,8, 8>  b;
>
> Matrix<double, 8, 1>  l;
> Matrix<double, 8, 1>  x;
> b.Zero();
> l.Zero();
> b*l;
>
>
> -----原始邮件-----
> *发件人:*"Rasmus Munk Larsen" <[email protected]>
> *发送时间:*2021-07-09 04:57:30 (星期五)
> *收件人:* [email protected]
> *抄送:*
> *主题:* Re: [eigen] dense matrix multiplication
>
> It looks like your build of Eigen is set up to call the function gemv_ an
> external BLAS library for large matrices, possibly by setting the macro
> EIGEN_USE_BLAS. See the documentation here:
> https://eigen.tuxfamily.org/dox/TopicUsingBlasLapack.html
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:57 AM 张瑞 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> dear all,
>>
>>
>> I'm a new user of Eigen, I want to get the multiplication of two matrix, and
>> met a confusing problem, and the code is as bellows(for simplicity, all
>> values are set to 0):
>>
>>
>> Matrix<double,8, 8>  b;
>> Matrix<double, 8, 1>  l;
>> Matrix<double, 8, 1>  x;
>> b.Zero();
>> l.Zero();
>> x = b*l;
>>
>>
>> Compiled under the windows platform and vs2019 environment, there is a
>> fatal error LNK1120:
>>
>> " Unresolved external symbol _dgemv,funticon "public: static void
>> __cdecl
>> Eigen::internal::general_matrix_vector_product_gemv<int,double,1,0,double,0>::run(int,int,double
>> const *,int,double const *,int,double *,int,double)" (?run@
>> ?$general_matrix_vector_product_gemv@HN$00$0A@N$0A@@internal@Eigen
>> @@SAXHHPBNH0HPANHN@Z) "
>>
>>
>> But if I Reduce the matrix dimension, it works, like:
>>
>> Matrix<double,4, 4>  b;
>> Matrix<double, 4 1>  l;
>> Matrix<double, 4, 1>  x;
>> b.Zero();
>> l.Zero();
>> x = b*l;
>>
>> very grateful for your help, thank you!
>>
>>

Reply via email to