We use singletons with EJBeans. It works.
We asked for permission (;-) in the list and several people gave it...
anyway, we simply can't live without singletons.
Regards
Javier Borrajo
www.tid.es
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Steve Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 1999 7:12 PM
>Subject: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io
>
>
>| I forgot to mention the most important restriction I've seen-- no static
>| methods/data members
>|
>| Can U have static methods/data members?
>
>Forbidden.
>
>But let's generalize it more:
>How can we have singleton objects?
>
>As far as I know only entity beans and JNDI contents are shared,
>session beans don't. But entities are persistent. Suppose I want
>to have something like a "static activeUsersList" in a bean and act
>as a true singleton object, only one instance avialable.
>How can I "cleanly" implement it?
>
>Ara Abrahamian
>bi!
>
>===========================================================================
>To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
>of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".