> > Then again, with the above knowledge you can assume that if you do not > use clusters, and you never redeploy your bean, you should be fine using > statics :-) But then again, you might not want to *depend* on that if > you want to upscale your app later on. ;-) > But if the beans in one server are independent of the other clusters, then statics are fine, right? I don't assume that statics automatically mean someone is trying to communicate/share objects between jvm/servers. In a lot of cases, statics may simply be a way to communicate/share objects between CLASSES in a single jvm/server. Am I missing something here? -Ron =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Joel Crisp
- EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Steve Roth
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Steve Roth
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Paul Hodgetts
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Ron Yust
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Fong Shing Lam
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Ron Yust
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Fong Shing Lam
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Ron Yust
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Ara Abrahamian
- Singletons (offshoot of EJB Restrictions-- thread... James Cook
- Re: Singletons (offshoot of EJB Restrictions-... Marc San Soucie
- Re: Singletons (offshoot of EJB Restrictions-... Ron Yust
- Re: Singletons (offshoot of EJB Restrictions-... Mel Nedelman
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Erik Huddleston
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Erik . Romson
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Erik . Romson
- Re: EJB Restrictions-- threads, io Armond Avanes
