Sanjay Nambiar wrote: > Hi, > Our application typically has the following scenario: > > 1>For Every Record of Table1 we have multiple records in Table2,in turn > whose every record has multiple records in Table3. > As the data volumes are very high,I wanted to know if the approach given > below is right > In the entity bean of Table 1 we have an extra attribute of say "Vector > type" which would contain the bean references of all the entitybeans > corresponding to Table 2.The same is done for the relationship between table > 2 and table 3 > In the entityBean for Table 1 we query the Table 2 and populate the > entitybean instances of Table 2 from Table 1 entitybean itself and store the > bean references in the Vector and then this Table 1 entitybean is accessed > from the sessionbean for all the records. If by this you mean anything other than calling a finder method on the entity bean for table 2 to retrieve an enumeration of EJBObject references, then there is something definitely wrong with what you are doing. You MUST go through the finder method to retrieve the entity bean instances for table 2. If you do that, then I don't see a problem with the rest of it.
begin:vcard n:Wilson;Chip tel;fax:(214) 358-0353 tel;work:(214) 642-4559 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.axyssolutions.com/ org:Axys Solutions adr:;;;Dallas;TX;; version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Application Architect note:Sun Certified Java Architect x-mozilla-cpt:;-25088 fn:Chip Wilson end:vcard
