Hi! Kirk Pepperdine wrote: > What happens if the container decides to passivate the bean? How does a > passivated bean listen for an event? This should not be a problem. The bean instance itself may not be a JMS listener, of course, so you would have to register a proxy to it as a JMS-listener which would communicate with the bean through the EJBObject, which will take care of the magic of making the object seems always "alive". As it always does. /Rickard -- Rickard �berg @home: +46 13 177937 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684 =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
- EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ashwin Dinakar
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ian McCallion
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ashwin Dinakar
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ashwin Dinakar
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ian McCallion
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Andrzej Jan Taramina
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Kirk Pepperdine
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Bernd Trops
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Ashwin Dinakar
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Lahooti, Hamid
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Jon Tirsen
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Peter Michael
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Lahooti, Hamid
- Re: EJB and JMS Integration Issues Rickard �berg
