Title: RE: Transaction isolation level useless at the ejb server level ?

> Serial reuse of the same instance would adhere to the
> principle that there are
> never two threads executing in the same instance at the same
> time. It would be
> equivalent to use of pessimistic locking with exclusive locks
> even for read-only
> access so would be an unsatisfactory designpoint for a
> server. I suppose it may
> be a useful deployment option in some bizarre situations!

Weblogic uses this pessimistic locking approach.

I think this is an unacceptable approach for an EJB server. I don't know if all bean developers using an EJb server with such forced pessimistic locking realize that the beans are getting locked for reads.


>
> Ian McCallion
>
> ==============================================================
> =============
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST".  For general help,
> send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>

Reply via email to