Hi Richard,
> Do you pass by copy or reference? Pass by copy is required in EJB even
for
> intra-VM invocations.
<vendor>
This is configurable with a command line parameter "-DEJBCopyArgs"
A list of some of the optimizations, scalability is at
http://www.borland.com/devsupport/appserver/faq/Availability_Scalability_Per
formance.html
</vendor>
regards,
-Robert
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Monson-Haefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2000 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: Session EJBs vs. Java Objects
> Robert Castaneda wrote:
>
> > <Vendor>
> > >>Even if you do not perform the a remote method invocation, still EJB
> > >>needs to deal with method parameters and return type through
> > >>marshalling, which is dead slow on some JVMs. (On my machine
everything
> > >>slows down to 25%).
> >
> > Our Container and Visibroker have optimisations for this, where calls in
the
> > same vm can avoid marshalling. This is container dependant, not jvm
> > dependant.
> >
> > </vendor>
> >
>
> Do you pass by copy or reference? Pass by copy is required in EJB even
for
> intra-VM invocations.
>
> --
> Author of Enterprise JavaBeans
> Published by O'Reilly & Associates
>
> EJB FAQ
> http://www.jguru.com/faq/EJB
>
> EJBNow.com
> http://www.ejbnow.com
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
