> Good point on the draw back of any single wire protocol like IIOP/DCOM. But
> then also please see OMG specs for IIOP enabled firewall specs ( Orbix
> Wonderwall, and Visigenic's Gatekeeper are implementations of the same ).
But this is only for server-side firewall. You cannot depend on client
firewalls to have this kind of support.
> One clarification, cant we have RMI/JRMP, RMI/IIOP, RMI/SOAP? If required
> the implementor decides which protocol to use beneath. Would that be a
> considered a bad design?
No, it would be a great design, and is exactly what I proposed in my
first response to this thread (see archives). The EJB specification
should depend on RMI as "wire protocol". No more, no less.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dreambean.com
Question reality
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
