Hi!
John O'Shea wrote:
> On a side note, if you are not an IIOP expert why do you feel qualified
> to try discredit a protocol which an open consortium of 800+ of the
> largest software and vertical industry companies in the world defined
> and are happy with?
I'm not discrediting IIOP. I'm discrediting the general approach, as it
is outdated in the J2EE context (in the CORBA context it is perfectly
valid). As I have stated, my reasoning is not based on the
goodness/badness of IIOP. That is, IMHO of course, irrelevant.
> Can you clarify how others could interpret your contexts if you use your
> way of putting them onto the wire and everyone else uses theirs? i.e.
> how would another server know how to examine your contexts?
The same way Jini solves it: if server A is calling server B, server B's
protocol-implementation is installed in A's codebase. If RMI/JRMP is
used this could be done by way of dynamic classloading for minimal
administration, but can be done manually for other solutions. This would
allow maximum flexibility. Again, please see the Jini article on JDC for
the basic argument.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dreambean.com
Question reality
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
