> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 3:27 AM > To: Vikramjit Singh; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: simultaneous hits on weblogic > > > Hi Vikramjit, Hi, > > I am sorry, if that was so painfull. Dont be sorry coz it was not painful. > > I didn't intended so. But i would like to tell you one thing. > > What was the question ? > How many hits a Weblogic Server can take if it is running as > a cluster of > 2. > > Now the lady intends to ask somebody on this list who is > actually having > some experience of working on Weblogic ( mind not in devlopment > environment but in actually deployment environment ), who can > guide her > with some rough figures, with which she can trade off between > either using > weblogic for the application or not, or if she has to > increase the no. of > servers > and so...on.....
Its nice that you have a knack of understanding questions, which are just one liners. I wish even i understood just by mail what the question was meant to be. Now if the question was also put as you have framed it, then sure would have not replied also. > > When i said you are right, but not specific to the context > off question, > because > you should not start talking so weardly that you took that > discussion from > EJB's > to the hardware. Didnt get that sentence, could you type more clearly. > > # Do you know what application she is going to run on these servers? > weather it is a pure web application using jsp/servlets or > j2ee application > using EJB's. > > # Do you know how much resources, she would need to run that > application? > probably if the application is using EJB's then how many > Entity beans are > there. > What kind of transaction support is that application handling. > Tell me are you a collegue of hers, or a lawyer. If the orignal poster would have said this is how i meant to be asked, it would sound much better, rather than you framing the one liner question to such an indepth one. This forum is meant to answer to the questions. If you understood the question so nicely you could have replied. Either you should have replied, if not then please dont impose your self imposed ban that what one should answer, and what one should not answer. > I am sorry, that i didn't knew your qualities where you can > actually start > commenting > upon Hardware requirments without knowing the Software requirments. Again dont be sorry. But yeah atleast i tried to help. You could also try to help. See i replied you could have replied back stating the technical portion, that would have been more polite, not coming up with how one should answer and what one should answer. No body will take this line down. > > One more thing iwould like to bring to your notice is, why is > the traffic > so low on this list. I am not a list admin, ask the admin. > > I don't know for how long are you associated with this list, but i am > associated with list from > the days of EJB1.0. And you can search the archives where you > would find > some nice > discussions which use to happen on this list, where people > use to talk more > about > EJB specs, and how can they be further improved etc..... 2 months old. Does a person being on the list for how long also matter, or being on the list for 2-3 years and not replying even once, but rather if one replies just pinning him down that not reply like this and reply like that. I try to contribute as much as i can. For replying to the question, i searched through websites and then came up with a answer thats reasonable, and not in the slightest way wanna misguide the orignal poster of the question. What do u expect to reply to a one liner question. Alas, of course if everybody had a gift of knowing what the question says in soo detail as you do. > > But b'coz of such nonsense questions being asked, and > probably even more > nonsense > answers being given out here, lot of good people have started > ignoring all > this. Now i am feeling sorry but not on myself. How can you decide whats nonsense. Since you might be a master of EJB and have a knack of understading questions you think that what others ask and what others reply is 'NONSENSE'. > > Probably thats the reason why i wrote that mail to you > personnally and not > to this list. I think i need not justify why i wrote to the list. > > I am sorry if what i did, is not accepted to the list. Dont be sorry, but yeah be sorry for saying 'NONSENSE' to what does not make sense to you. > > *********************** > enJoy Life with Technology > *********************** > pirbhu ;-) "Convince, Confuse, Corrupt" I agree to it. > > Prabhakar Goel Vikramjit Singh. > =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
