Rickard �berg wrote:
> Well, containers have to generate the EJBObject and EJBHome
> implementations. No option there. Could you explain how a container
> could be compliant with EJB1.0 and not generate classes?
Generic code which uses dynamic type information can serve
as a substitute for the EJBObject and EJBHome generated classes.
(The generic code can either using reflection, or using JNI).
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
