> > Theoretically, yes. Re-deploy the bean with StupidPerson as the
> > remote interface. The proxies should resolve to either Person or Stupid
> > types. I'm not sure if PortableRemoteObject currently supports this,
> but
> it
> > should.
> >
> "Should" as in it says so in the RMI spec or "should" as in it is a
> feature
> we want?
>
>
[Chip Wilson]
Should as in the EJB spec states that the remote interface may have
superinterfaces, and if PortableRemoteObject did not correctly narrow the
EJBObject proxy to these types, then there would be no point in having
superinterfaces. Therefore it is implied by the EJB spec.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
