My understanding is that this is one place where vendors can distinguish
themselves: no points subtracted if they don't have it, nice if they do,
for the reason mentioned. Another reason might be for load balancing. If
the session bean cannot be serialized, then I would think that session
would have to remain with that server.
Rickard �berg wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> Evan Ireland wrote:
> > >
> > > The spec says statefull session beans will not survive system crashes.
> > >
> > > However, it doesnt really say if they should survive gracefull server
> > > shutdown. Do you know if any of the servers will serialize the statefull
> > > session beans on shutdown and load them back up on startup.
> >
> > I am not sure that it would be worth doing this, since any
> > clients trying to use the session object references while
> > the server is down will fail.
>
> What if the server downtime is less than 10 seconds (or a minute), in
> case of system upgrades? The spec. says that object references should be
> valid over a long period of time...
>
> /Rickard
>
> --
> Rickard �berg
>
> @home: +46 13 177937
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
---------------
Ted Kahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
