On the EJB 1.1 spec, section 8.4, it says
"Also, an EJB object may be deleted directly using other
means than the remove() operation (e.g. by deletion of a database
record). The direct insert and direct delete transitions in
the diagram represent such direct database manipulation."
Does the above statement mean that an EJB 1.1 container
must remove the EJBObject, when its corresponding
record has been "direct deleted" from the database?
But how can the container remove the EJBObject if the database
does *not* notify the container of a direct delete?
Am I missing something?
--
Rubens.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
