----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin Dick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: MQSeries and EJB
> Ian McCallion wrote:
> >
> > Jouni Juutinen wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone have experiences of MQSeries participating in EJB
> > > transactions? For example if one transaction includes Entity Bean
> > updating
> > > database table (JDBC) and a Entity or Session Bean inserting a message
> > > into MQSeries queue. Obviously I would like this whole transaction to
> > > commit or rollback as one entity. I quess this would require
> > transactional
> > > resource manager for MQSeries. Native MQSeries access (MQSeries
binding
> > > for Java) supports syncpoints but that's not JTS compliant. Do I have
to
> > > wait for JMS-version of MQSeries (when that one will be available?)?
> >
> > As you say, it is highly desireable that the putting and getting of
> > messages to queues can be committed or backed out under syncpoint
control
> > and this does indeed require that MQSeries be a transactional resource
> > manager.
> >
> > In fact MQSeries is already a transactional resource manager supporting
the
> > (pre-java) open standard for coordination of transactional resource
> > managers, XA. Unfortunately, no EJB servers today are based on XA, hence
no
> > there is currently no coordination between MQSeries and EJBs.
>
> It was my impression that Persistence PowerTier, Oracle Application
> Server, and Secant Extreme all support XA - PPT and OAS as resources, SE
> as both a resource and a coordinator.
Oracle 8.i EJB's are based on XA as well.
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
