Rickard,
Can you elaborate on what kind of solution you were suggesting? What would
you actually be binding into the namespace?
thanks,
jim
----- Original Message -----
From: Rickard �berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: UUID Implementation
Hey
James Cook wrote:
> A few people have asked in other threads about implementing a Unique ID
> Generator. A few people were debating whether it could be implemented as
an
> EJB, and if so, would it be a session bean or entity bean. There are
> probably many ways to approach the problem, so I would be interested in
> other opinions as well.
Another possible solution with EJB1.1 is to make a simple bean which is
registered in the java:comp/env namespace. This allows simple
implementation and easy access to it, and there is nothing (AFAIK) in
the EJB1.1 DTD that limits what types of resources can be bound into the
namespace (specifically the "res-type" element has no limitations on its
contents). The question is whether the actual EJB1.1 implementations
introduce any limitations on what interfaces or classes that may be
used.
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www-und.ida.liu.se/~ricob684
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
